Contention

Julian Jaynes' book The Bicameral Mind and the Origin of Consciousness argues that  language is consciousness. His arguments have met considerable criticism from many scientists. Physicist Roger Penrose, in particular, argues against language being consciousness. He quotes Albert Einstein,

"The words of the language, as they are written or spoken, do not seem to play any role in my mechanism of thought. The psychical entities which seem to serve as elements of thought are certain signs and more or less clear images which can be voluntarily reproduced and combined... The above mentioned elementa are, in my case, of visual and some muscular type. Conventional words or other signs have to be sought for laboriously only in a second stage, when the mentioned associative play is sufficiently established and can be reproduced at will."

Mozart, when alone and in a good humor, received musical inspirations.

"Whence and how do they come? I do not know and I have nothing to do with it."

His mind worked on the musical themes until he had the entire composition finished in his head.

"My mind seizes it as a glance of my eye a beautiful picture of a handsome youth. It does not come to me successively, with various parts worked out in detail, as they will later on, but in its entirety that my imagination lets me hear it."

Nicholi Telsa discovered alternating current - the foundation of today's electrical power - in a vision appearing to him all at once, fully formed, complete with an internal visual model of a working alternator. He knew instantly what the vision meant and that it would work. Other machines appeared in his mind and he could even operate the machines, determine what they did, and later take these mental images apart and inspect the parts for wear! Communication of these findings followed his visions.

Penrose's Position

Penrose considered instantaneous judgements of inspiration to be the hallmark of conscious thinking. He believed there was not, couldn't be, an algorithmic process to describe this sort of aesthetic process. It is especially important to him that the language center of the brain is located in the left cerebral hemisphere. If language is consciousness, he argued, then only the left cerebral hemisphere could be conscious. This can't be so, since the other hemisphere plays vital roles in thinking - especially in musical and mathematical thought. The inspiration comes first and is followed by the arduous process of hammering the discovery into language or symbols or notes that result in the communication of the thought to other people. In any event, Penrose would have us believe language played no part in many of mankind's most brilliant scientific or philosophical breakthroughs.

I dwell on Dr. Penrose's argument precisely because it illustrates so well the problems we experience when  thinking about thinking.

Consciousness is not inspiration

Inspiration is not the same process as consciousness. Observation is not the same process as consciousness. The experiences of Mozart, Einstein, and Telsa are but three notable examples of a phenomenon common to almost everyone.

Inspirations - creative insights - are observations, often coming all at once the way we observe a mountain or a cloud in one glance. Inspiration is a good word for this, meaning the insights are breathed in - as one takes a single breath - from some deeper level of perception. And that is exactly what they are; perceptions. Perceptions are not the same as consciousness. Furthermore, the perceptions would not have happened if the minds doing the perceiving did not already have the basic conscious equipment to handle the vision. Three hundred years ago, the most brilliant visionary would not have been able to have Telsa's inspiration of how to create alternating current. Mankind had not yet discovered electricity.

And if the inspired minds did not have the ability to transform the information into meaningful communications, their perceptions - their discoveries - would not have become major scientific or philosophical breakthroughs because nobody would have ever known about them.

Consciousness Defined

The problem is that Julian Jaynes and Roger Penrose differ in what they think consciousness is. In this CD I use the term consciousness according to the original derivation of the word to know together.

Consciousness, in this definition, is the process we use to communicate our perceptions of the natural world so they may be shared with others (or even with ourselves in the future).

Conscious models are tools enabling those who can understand them, to share a common awareness. In the cyclic process of drawing together, weaving, expanding outward in a direction, and observing the result, consciousness is the interval between the outward expansion and the observation of the results. It occupies the outward phase, not the inward phase. To use the example of the archer, from Tibet,

1. Pulling back the arrow in the bow is perception.

2. Aiming the arrow is matching the perception with memory.

3. Releasing the arrow is consciousness (a response - the word, like the arrow, escapes you).

4. Observing where the arrow strikes is awareness (because it is a surprise if it misses or if it hits the target).

Consciousness as the Creator

Consciousness creates social organization, or culture, and maintains its existence and growth by allowing the members of that organization to perceive more and more about their surroundings.

We know together via communications. Communicate derives from the Latin communicans meaning to make common (by sharing or imparting information).

The essential aspect of consciousness is a process of shifting information from one level of communication to another, higher level. As a simple example, lets do a little experiment.

An Experiment in Consciousness

The process of communication involved my perceiving the world around me. The perception was created by the communication web of billions of sensory, nerve, and muscle cells within my body. The myriad methods cells use to communicate and derive a visual model in my brain is one level of communication.

I could be aware of the scene without being conscious of it. In fact, I might be on deck thinking about something entirely different without being conscious of the awesome colors of the South Pacific sunset in this isolated dot of calm in the energetic sea.

Watching the shark, for example, distracted the focus of my consciousness. In that moment, my sensory system and cellular communication network (peripheral vision, sense of smell, hearing, neuronal activity) were aware (processing information) of the rest of the scene around me but I was only conscious of the shark.

The reason I was conscious of the shark is because my memory has associated concepts, mental models, relative to the predatory nature of sharks, the fact that their skeleton is all cartilage, and the names of species matching the visual pattern I was watching. The shift from the visual model built by the communications of my sensory cells to the higher language models of names, tissues, and expected behavior patterns is another level in the process of consciousness.

But this particular example of consciousness does not end there, because I wrote down the experience. The transformation of my cellular flow of communications into an internal remapping of the information onto a scientific patterning of words and associations was one shift of information. Writing down the information was a second shift, moving the consciousness outside of myself - first into my logbook and later into my computer. When you read the words describing my experience on the mid-ocean atoll, I made common the experience of my senses. And you shared my perception - became conscious of my observations - through language.

3 Levels of Consciousness

The three levels are all expressions of consciousness - knowing together.

1. The cells communicate to create the mental perception of the world.

2. This perceptive web of communication is filtered, specialized, refined by the process of comparing the perceptions to my own memory systems - a process using words and even art or music depending on my particular abilities.

3. Next I translate these mental understandings into patterns of finger movement to write the idea in words (or images) I can share with other humans.

This seems a rather involved way of describing the process of consciousness, but it is important to catch the transformations involved. Because the transformations are not ethereal, irrelevant events. The transformation process is a fundamental aspect of life.

The Language of Consciousness

Language is clearly the most common form of achieving this transformation, even within our own heads. Humans use language to define, and thus think about, things we see and experience. We may have an observation without, or beyond, our knowledge of words but I submit that such observations are not to be included in the category of knowing together.

Language unquestionably plays a major role in everyday consciousness, but, there are other forms of communications that constitute knowing together. On the human level there is music, mathematical symbols, visual art, body language, dance, a wide range of smells, touches, and sounds that make thoughts common.

The Boundaries of Consciousness

Knowing together includes communications with other creatures as well. We know together with dogs and cats and chickens and most other domestic animals. We even communicate with plants and include them in our knowing together (a process called Agriculture). We sometimes use other creatures, such as flowers or foods, as signals to develop special levels of consciousness between ourselves.

Consciousness includes all aspects of our culture - including verbal language.

There are also different states of consciousness that involve more than our immediate physical environment. I want to go into this further, to consider how and why we manage to know together, and the levels of consciousness we enjoy. But first we should establish some parallel definitions dealing with other aspects and levels of mind besides consciousness.

Let us, therefore, agree to limit consciousness to one aspect of mind and set out some definitions of other words related to mind;

Back to Consciousness

Let's return now to consciousness itself.

Human consciousness is the metrical process we use to build models (paradigms) of our perceptions. Words are a good example of the conscious process. We share definitions of words, words are models. We use them to communicate our perceptions to one another. These models are real; just as a ship's model, or a map, is real. The model - be it a simple word, a mathematical theory, a philosophical understanding, or a scientific concept - alters reality by making possible the common use of new patterns and relationships.

Once perceived and modeled (mapped, transformed into communications), the model can be manipulated by the action of those who share the understanding of the model. They can build on the relationship or destroy it as their actions reinforce or detract from the shared experience. Consciousness is like an enzyme, a catalyst, it tags existing natural behavioral relationships and makes them visible, understandable, and thus removes them from the realm of mystery or magic.

The Ideal World

Penrose believes the Mandelbrot set, revealed as an endlessly detailed pattern from what was once thought a chaotic relationship, "is not an invention of the human mind: it was a discovery. Like Mount Everest, the Mandelbrot set is just there!"

Rene Descartes, in the seventeenth century and Carl Pepper, John Eckles and Roger Penrose propose another world, a Platonic world of ideals, where relationships lie waiting for properly attuned and prepared minds.

I don't agree. The world of ideals is a world of ideas, constructed by our communication web and maintained by our awareness when it is activated by those communications. A triangle is not just there. It is a geometrical construct, invented by human minds to provide a template for future comparisons and measurements. A circle does not "have" 360 degrees. The people who constructed our system of geometry devised a circle and divided it into 360 equal units as a system of measurement. Circles can be as easily divided into 100 degrees, or 400 degrees, and are, for some purposes.

The world of ideals is created by human communications - and is as real as human beings, who are created by molecular, bacterial, cellular, and ecosystem communication webs.

Man created fractals - they are a linguistic tool, a catalyst, that enables us to shape non-linear relationships and predict future behavior, thus reducing the error of expectations. Just as a linear graph of any function is a metrical tool used to help us display and understand naturally existing relationships. The Mendelbrot set is not there at all without a computer to display it.

The Platonic world is also a creation, a museum, a memory, a treasure, constructed within the language mind of man - in literature, words, symbols, and constructions. The ideal world was not "just there" like a mountain waiting to be discovered, it was created, learned, devised, by human communication webs and is now "there" in all its magnificent diversity waiting for students to explore it.

The ideal world is the accumulated models of mankind's insights into the patterns of behavior that exist in the natural world; a world created by the process of mind; a living world where, for 4 billion years, the myriad forms of life have struggled to make sense out of their perceptions.

Slowly, their struggle has built tier upon tier of interlocked behavioral relationships - nested models of communications. And new life forms appeared upon the mental models created by their predecessors. Thus, evolution is the learning process of consciousness.

The map becomes the territory

In living systems, the model becomes the reality. The model is a concept (to take together), a communication pattern forming the physical manifestation of each living entity. Plato's world is a concept of concepts. Triangles are a concept. Rulers, clocks, dimensions, are concepts; communication tools that become the platforms we stand on to build new concepts.

Mind uses these tools - if it has them and knows how to use them - to develop new perceptions. Thus concepts are a means of perception. Just as an eye is a means of perception. An eye, in fact, is a concept - a behavior pattern, an understanding unraveled from the manifestation of DNA memory banks interacting with the world perceived from the viewpoint of the embryonic cells.

All forms of concepts are intercommunications that enable the observer to perceive, remember and respond with greater and greater clarity. The Thread of Awareness in Chaos is the model describing the process of becoming, a process where consciousness is the means by which awareness forms itself from the cosmic threads.

.